Sunday, January 11, 2009
Will the US Constitution Surrive The Oregon Govenor
Will the US Constitution Survive The Oregon Governor!?
We think not, read the following, before the loss of the 2ed Amendment to the US Constitution becomes a fact. Which it might, given that the current Speaker of the House has limited a 100 years old tradition of debate prior to bills passing in the US House of Representatives, to no debate.
This leaves 200 million American citizens without any representation at all. Bringing to light our observations that elected Democrats lie.
http://inthetrenches-egor.blogspot.com/
Egor.
Monday, September 15, 2008
The Next Big Future
http://nextbigfuture.com/
Later.
Egor
Thursday, July 31, 2008
A Reminder
Egor
Sunday, June 08, 2008
Sherman Lackey For President
So if you don't want forced:
- health care.
- low paying job.
- high rent.
- higher house payments.
- roads full of potholes.
- a non working Amtrak.
- a federal budget full of unneeded spending.
Then Write in the name of Sherman Lackey.
He has:
- Experience in management.
- Political experience at the local level.
- the moxie to get the job done.
- the belief that less government oversight is better.
I checked with my master and he said he will do the job! Just write his name on the ballot.
That's our second Amendment right for this week.
Monday, April 28, 2008
Money Money Money
No idea how they finance this stuff, prehaps they shouldn't have collecgted taxes this year?
That is How we see it.
Egor
Friday, April 11, 2008
The Walrus Tale
The Walrus Tale
An Original Poem Written By Sherman Lackey
(With Profuse Apologies To Lewis Carol)
“The time has come”, the Walrus said, “to assonate the King
He has had four long years to correct things and has done nothing!”
A Clam close by piped up, trying not to be annoying,
With all of the security surrounding him how will it be done without warning?
The Walrus stopped in his tracks and placing his left hand in his pocket,
Took out a Cuban Cigar, which he lit from the lighter from his right hand pocket.
Puffing ever so quickly, his hands clasped behind his back,
He began a slow walk Down to the large rock and back.
Looking the Clam in the eye, making the poor fellow quite nervous,
The Walrus asked if this was true, all of the clams said, Yes!” in a chorus.
“What shall we do then?” mused the walrus,
A worried look upon his puss.
Seeing the commotion upon the beach
A Sea turtle popped up in the surf, just out of reach.
After careful inquires of the Walrus and the Clams,
Reported that he had a plan.
“This will end democracy for good”, The Turtle said,
“The beauty of it is you do not have to kill the king dead.”
Clams and Walrus looked each other in the eye,
“Surely”, said the Walrus, “you tell a lie!”
“We must elect HRC to be king and then
She will force everyone to obey, or lock them up in a pen”.
“Ah!” the Walrus replied, “All she has to do is convince the people,
And she will be king, cunning and able”.
Forced medical plan, giving in to the countries enemies,
She will be able to do what ever She darn well Pleases”.
“I like the way you think, clams don’t you agree?”
But looking around the Walrus found on the beach was only he.
Later.
Egor
Friday, January 11, 2008
At Last An Affordable Car
http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5gZ9t0K8xidKzz7rtkrB6Xye0LNcQ
For what it is worth, in out solar system there is a planet that gets rays from our sun. It is frozen solid CO2. How come it isn't warm if CO2 keeps in the heat?
That is how we see it.
Egor
Tuesday, January 08, 2008
Cry Baby For President!
Just what this country needs and must be part of the "change" they are all taking about. I can't envision G. Washington T. Roosevelt W. Wilson H.Hover breaking down during the campaign.
To view this mess we have a link http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6qgWH89qWks&eurl=http://tailrank.com/posts/source/2533274790396996/youtube.com
Vote for Blubbers! I don't think so.
That is our opinion.
Egor
Sunday, October 21, 2007
Another Round
Friday, August 17, 2007
How Do We Know What We Know As Applied To Politices
How do we know what is and what is not, that is how do we know that we know what it is that we know. If we know only what we think we know then is what we know actual or are we not knowing and filling in the blanks for what we think we know but what we know isn’t what we really know at all?
Fiction is based on what we might know if we knew what it is that we know but what if we don’t know what it is that we know but instead know things that we don’t know? How do we then tell fact apart form fiction? Don’t bother asking the senator from New York that is running for the office of president as they clearly have issues with what is known and instead aspire to the unknown weather or not it is known or not.
Perhaps we know what it is that we know by separating the known into two different pieces, the phenomenal (things we can’t see or test but believe anyway) and the noumena (that which we can see and test). This is different than inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning that rest on a foundation which is self evident and can be a landmine for political candidates which is why they tend to avoid it.
In this way we have things we can explain and things we can sort of explain. Then as we are able to test for more and test these things we can then know more as opposed to knowing less.
Then normal people have no issues with not knowing the known and they explain the unknown by ideas like prayer and miracles where as political canidates only know what is known and have no explanation of what they don’t know. Members of the press that are aware of the restriction of what the known unknown’s then baffle the candidate with the unknown known because of the phenomenal/noumena separation.
So how can we then know that the noumena even exist? Good question for another time, just remember not to ask the candidate to answer a question containing an unknown known or a known unknown as they will wax eloquent about anything and everything else and not answer the question. Why you ask, because they only know the known and are completely unaware of the phenomenal.
That’s how we see it.
Egor.
Friday, June 01, 2007
Winston For June 1
Bessie Braddock: “Sir, you are drunk.” Churchill: “Madam, you are ugly. In the morning, I shall be sober.”
Nancy Astor: “Sir, if you were my husband, I would give you poison.”Churchill: “If I were your husband I would take it.”
June is here the Moon if full and life will go on.
Egor
Tuesday, March 20, 2007
To Vista Or Not To Vista - The Government Says No!
I think the phrase that they used is "no compelling reason"
Have fun and as always, enjoy.
Egor
Monday, March 19, 2007
It's Your Money!
Enjoy.
Egor
Tuesday, February 20, 2007
Trators Amoungst Us
By taking this vote, it is our opinion, congress gave the OK dokie to have you killed. Yes they have now taken the idea of Abortion and applied it to war and I must say in our view the yes voters on this thing are cowards one and all.
That's how we see it any how.
Egor